Opening post
Member actions
ShareDiscussion
Discussion
Opening post
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
Share
CrimsonAvenger wrote: ↑Tue Aug 31, 2021 5:37 am
Amazing how he continues to gets these gigs - good for him! Shows that you can do well in some format on a decent world stage and the world takes notice and you get your chances for a while. He has never managed to do well internationally for Zim in T20Is, but continues to get picked in these leagues.
Kind of strange how he doesn't have much to show in T20Is though despite being good in tests and ODIs, similar to Moor having some good knocks in Tests and T20Is but not ODIs.
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
Share
secretzimbo wrote: ↑Tue Aug 31, 2021 9:26 am
Yeah it’s crazy how he gets these gigs, T20 probably his weakest format and his record is poor. Might be controversial this, but have to wonder if he was a black zimbo with a Shona name would he have ever have got these T20 gigs? Or is it just because he stands out and is therefore well known around the world as the brown zimbo?
Nonetheless it’s good news and hopefully he goes well!
Member actions
Share
secretzimbo wrote: ↑Tue Aug 31, 2021 9:26 am
Yeah it’s crazy how he gets these gigs, T20 probably his weakest format and his record is poor. Might be controversial this, but have to wonder if he was a black zimbo with a Shona name would he have ever have got these T20 gigs? Or is it just because he stands out and is therefore well known around the world as the brown zimbo?
Nonetheless it’s good news and hopefully he goes well!
Member actions
ShareMember actions
Share
sloandog wrote: ↑Tue Aug 31, 2021 10:16 am
Burl should be on the radar for the BPL for sure, especially the way he performed against Bangladesh recently.
His bowling seems to be coming along nicely
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
Share
ZIMDOGGY wrote: ↑Tue Sep 28, 2021 8:52 am
They all seem very cut up by the omission from the T20s.
But by ZC travesty levels this is one of the lower crimes.
But I guess players want to play.
There are some further thoughts though.
Why did the oldest of the fab 4 survive the cut?
Especially when it wasn’t a long time ago people thought he didn’t make the team on merit. He does, but people questioned it.
Secondly, this could be about cash.
Someone mentioned that BTs newer contract was structured against games played?
If that theory is true that could explain everything really, because he could’ve signed the contract with the understanding that he would be selected for those matches, and they’re probably more of those matches the normal one dayers.
It also explains something Sean said about messing with the team’s livelihood when he quit and was reinstated
Member actions
Share
ZIMDOGGY wrote: ↑Tue Sep 28, 2021 8:52 am
They all seem very cut up by the omission from the T20s.
But by ZC travesty levels this is one of the lower crimes.
But I guess players want to play.
There are some further thoughts though.
Why did the oldest of the fab 4 survive the cut?
Especially when it wasn’t a long time ago people thought he didn’t make the team on merit. He does, but people questioned it.
Secondly, this could be about cash.
Someone mentioned that BTs newer contract was structured against games played?
If that theory is true that could explain everything really, because he could’ve signed the contract with the understanding that he would be selected for those matches, and they’re probably more of those matches the normal one dayers.
It also explains something Sean said about messing with the team’s livelihood when he quit and was reinstated
Member actions
ShareMember actions
Share
CrimsonAvenger wrote: ↑Tue Sep 28, 2021 4:09 pm
The more I think about it, the more it looks like Rajput is more of a collateral damage as the big four, for some reason, don't want to train their guns directly on ZC itself or even towards Masakadza. Or they are tactically using Rajput's name as a way to make their displeasure felt about ZC. At worst, Rajput could be an incompetent yes-man for ZC. Why should that drive players to retirement - the target should be ZC, isn't it?
Unless there are no concrete issues mentioned attributable to Rajput and Rajput alone and not ZC, how could one just assume everything is wrong with Rajput? I'm willing to change this stance, but for now, it looks like an ugly mudslinging between the fab 4 and a few at ZC and Rajput seems to be caught in this crossfire.
P.S. Not saying this as an Indian and I have no idea if Rajput has contributed anything at all towards the growth of cricketers in Zim anyway, but to make him look like a villain without clearly stating how he has directly contributed to this disaffection among the seniors, or not waiting for him to put forth his side of the story (if at all) just does not sound correct.
Member actions
Share
zimbos_05 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 28, 2021 10:45 pm
Your last paragraph is telling.
Member actions
Share
CrimsonAvenger wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 1:44 am
zimbos_05 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 28, 2021 10:45 pm
Your last paragraph is telling.
Not sure I got that. All I meant was, I would have said the same thing if the guy was a Whatmore or a Klusener or whoever else it was.
Member actions
Share