Opening post
Member actions
ShareDiscussion
Discussion
Opening post
Member actions
ShareMember actions
Share
...........This make me very glad because after over two decades of administration in Zimbabwe Cricket, we finally have evidence of corruption in the form of jobs-for-pals by Kirsty Coventry and the President's son-in-law. And I'm so ecstatic that Hogg and Ellman-Brown are the beneficiaries. This is what real corruption looks like ladies and gentlemen. Plus no timeframe! 😂 😂 😂
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
Share
ZIMDOGGY wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 8:57 am
Read before posting
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
Share
foreignfield wrote: ↑Fri Aug 02, 2019 11:18 am
Very funny.
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
Share
jimmylesaint wrote: ↑Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:16 am
😂 😂 ... or not and will just move on probably earning more money selling chewing gum on the street corner.
Member actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
ShareMember actions
Share
9 Aug, 2019 Liam Brickhill
What the resolution reached by Zimbabwe Cricket and SRC entails
The spat between Zimbabwe's Sports and Recreation Commission and Zimbabwe Cricket appears to have reached a resolution. On Thursday the SRC announced that the dispute had been settled, with all parties agreeing to an "Order by Consent", with the matter now pending before an administrative court. Zimbabwe Cricket's directors will be reinstated once the registrar of that court issues an order to that effect, and the interim committee will be dissolved.
There's a lot of legal jargon there. What does this all actually mean?
Basically, it means that the SRC blinked first.
They made it known in their presentation at the ICC Board meeting in July that they felt that they had grounds to suspend the ZC board, alleging electoral irregularities in the board election, as well as various other allegations. Their suspension of the board was within their powers under the act of Parliament that created the SRC, but the ICC's perception was that it constituted unacceptable interference in cricket affairs, violating the laws to which ICC member nations have to adhere. In the meantime, the ZC board took the matter to court, appealing against the SRC's original suspension.
Still, the SRC stood their ground for a while, but as the collateral damage started to mount, with both the men's and women's sides stripped of their chance to compete at the T20 World Cup Qualifiers and the threat of expulsion looming, a resolution to the conflict became the only option.
Sports Minister Kirsty Coventry engineered a series of meetings between the ZC board and the SRC last week. A settlement was found, and the court order - once it is issued - will make that settlement official.
But while the SRC's latest statement essentially brought the dispute to an end, it was somewhat light on detail. Will the board be reinstated in its entirety? What was agreed at the meetings between ZC and the SRC? These details could well be important when the ICC meet and discuss Zimbabwe's suspension.
Member actions
Share