About 10 months to go before the flagship event. 6 months to go for the qualifiers. The last 3 World Cups have been won by the host nation...will the streak continue?
This is actually going to be a thread for the Qualifiers and up until the actual WC itself.
At the moment the top 3 in League 2 (automatical entry to WC Qualifer) look to be Scotland, Oman, and Namibia. The other teams along with the top two teams from the Challenge league will play a qualifier for the qualifier (confused anyone?).
So far the berths for the 10-team WCQ looks like the following:
1) Sri Lanka
2) Ireland
3) South Africa
4) Zimbabwe
5) Netherlands
6) Scotland
7) Oman
8) Namibia
The final 2 spots will be amongst USA, UAE, Nepal, PNG, Canada, and Jersey.
Assuming USA and UAE qualify, the 2023 Qualifier will be a much tougher contest than the 2018 was. There are no "pushover" sides that are there to just make up the numbers unlike last time. On top of that South Africa, who are perennial contenders, will be scrapping it out in the middle.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
England beat Bangladesh with a weakened squad (no Root, Stokes, Brook, or Hales). I actually thought Bangladesh would win 3-0. Largely poor batting from Bangladesh. The Big 4 struggling quite a bit. Only about 6 months left to get into some groove.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
No. The series is in Bangladesh. England sent a weakened squad and even their first string bowling attack is quite mediocre with the exception of Archer. Granted Adil Rashid is much better than I thought he was, but these were also turning pitches.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
In ODI cricket? England most certainly do. They have better ODI depth than any other team, and I include India.
Their domestic List A is still by far the highest standard List A comp in the world by some distance, and they have about 50 players that miss it each year due to international or Hundred commitments.
In ODI cricket? England most certainly do. They have better ODI depth than any other team, and I include India.
Their domestic List A is still by far the highest standard List A comp in the world by some distance, and they have about 50 players that miss it each year due to international or Hundred commitments.
Well its 2-2 now. In these conditions, Bangladesh are almost unstoppable...only 2 teams have won an ODI series in BD in the last 9 years, and it was England both times.
At any rate, this is actually a very good series for England. By leaving out their top 5 players, they ensure their next 12-15 guys get top quality experience in the subcontinent before the World Cup. Guys like Root, Stokes, Roy, et al get plenty of IPL and PSL exposure so they aren't missing anything. As a result, England may be the most well-prepared team heading into the WC in October.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
People are expecting Stokes to come back...IDK if he will or not. But why would Root not be in the ODI side?
People are presuming he will, just like they presumed AB would too, but officially he has retired.
It was more a question about Root, than a statement. It's hard to keep up with England as they play so much and use so many different players. Root hasn't played an ODI since July so I wasn't sure if he's still in their best ODI XI?
England's A side just got smashed 3-0 in the T20s...which is obviously our weaker format. Hency why I thought we *should* have won the ODIs 3-0. Obviously cricket is played on the field and not on sheets of paper, so unexpected results can pop up.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
League 2 has officially ended and in dramatic fashion. Everyone - including myself - had written Nepal off after they had only won 8 of their first 24 games...but having won 11 of their last 12. Nepal surpassed the USA and Namibia to seal automatic qualification to the WCQ!
Scotland, Oman, and Nepal finish in the top 3 of League 2.
Namibia, USA, UAE, and PNG will go to the play-off tournament that starts in 10 days time.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
How come Nepal aren't better at cricket? And by better I mean something like Zimbabwe or Netherlands level. It seems like it is the most popular sport in the country and they border India? Does the geography of the country make things difficult? Lack of money?
My All-time Zimbabwe XI
Neil Johnson, Brendan Taylor, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), David Houghton, Sean Williams, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Paul Strang, Eddo Brandes, Blessing Muzarabani
I always found it odd how poor their cricket was given its their #1 sport. Oddly enough soccer/football was always #1 in Bangladesh except for the 1997-2010 period. Cricket is back to #2 now.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
I always found it odd how poor their cricket was given its their #1 sport. Oddly enough soccer/football was always #1 in Bangladesh except for the 1997-2010 period. Cricket is back to #2 now.
Interesting, I just assumed cricket would be top dog there. When you say football is number 1, is that predominately overseas football, e.g EPL?
I would guess the national cricket team is more popular than say the national BAN football team?
Also in terms of whats played on the streets by kids - would it be cricket or football?
I always found it odd how poor their cricket was given its their #1 sport. Oddly enough soccer/football was always #1 in Bangladesh except for the 1997-2010 period. Cricket is back to #2 now.
Interesting, I just assumed cricket would be top dog there. When you say football is number 1, is that predominately overseas football, e.g EPL?
I would guess the national cricket team is more popular than say the national BAN football team?
Also in terms of whats played on the streets by kids - would it be cricket or football?
It’s hard to say for sure.
Cricket was very much a niche sport in Bangladesh before the 1997 ICC Trophy (now called WC Qualifier). It was still somewhat popular but football was king, queen, and bishop. But after elevation to Test status, cricket briefly took over football until probably 2010 or so. I couldn’t tell you the exact reason but cricket seems to be less popular just from a fan perspective. It’s still a big business and the BPL is still well attended.
But back in 2008 we would have several thousand in to watch a Test match, where Bangladesh inevitably got slaughtered. Nowadays, there is hardly 500 fans in for a Test or maybe 5000 for an ODI, whereas the stadium was absolutely jam packed before.
And it has nothing to do with success because Bangladesh now are obviously a much better team than in 2010 in all 3 formats. Unless, back then wins were so rare people came in hoping for a rare chance to witness history. Who knows? Lol.
I would however say that more people watch Bangladesh cricket than Bangladesh football, but that might be because cricket gets way more attention since we play that at the highest level and are in the abyss in terms of football.
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
Following football in Bangladesh must be tough, the national team is completely irrelevant, even in Asia, and I can't imagine the domestic league has much going for it.
I guess in the 2000s top tier international cricket was still a novelty. I think cricket's popularity is declining in most parts of the world - the T20 hype disguises the decline, but in all honesty I think far fewer people care about cricket now than they did 20 years ago.
My All-time Zimbabwe XI
Neil Johnson, Brendan Taylor, Murray Goodwin, Andy Flower (w), David Houghton, Sean Williams, Heath Streak (c), Andy Blignaut, Paul Strang, Eddo Brandes, Blessing Muzarabani