ZIMDOGGY wrote: Select a full strength team for game 1. Then in the 2nd, drop price for prosper, taibu for Regis, and say, ervine for vusi or someone(may not be ervine, could just be someone who scored well game 1). The reason is why play price twice when we know he's good, test players a little bit, but only slight tinkering as to not dilute competitiveness. This Aussie team is strong and the papers are hyping it up as saying they mean business.
I agree. This is no Continental Cup so go with the strongest team possible.
I differ in one aspect of this though. I wouldn't change the team simply for convenience. It has to forced by poor form or injury. We all agree that these guys mean business, so what makes us think that we will have the luxury of batting and bowling twice. It's a four day game remember. Besides, we know Aus has it's preferred bowling lineup so the bias here is on their batsmen. Those guys are competing among themselves for available spots in the Test side so you can be sure that Hughes, Warner, Ferguson, Paine & Khawaja will rack up the score. In my humble opinion, with the kind of options being thrown around, this side should comfortably beat us.
My advice to the powers that be is - select your best possible side throughout the tour. This might just be your reality check. (This for me will prove why we need to include old heads like Duffin & Ewing as opposed to the rookies).