I don't think Rabada is all that great in ODIs. I have been wrong before, so I could be wrong, but his stats look merely solid. I'd imagine he plays on as sporting a deck as you will find in ODIs. Amir could certainly blast through a side with 4-15 type figures, but then the other 8 games he will probably take 4-500.
The Windies certainly have talent, but talent is not enough to win games consistently at a world cup. That talent has to be synergized and organized. If the Windies can do that, they can certainly be a threat, like they are in the T20 format. But the ODI game isn't just about big hitting (Windies are amongst the best in that department) or flashy strokeplay for 20 odd deliveries. You have to be able to get about 5 runs an over, without taking risks, and save wickets for the last 10 overs to set up a challenging total. And then, because English/ODI/World Cup wickets are so flat, your bowlers will have to bowl immaculately to a plan and create some luck.
India, Australia, England, New Zealand, and South Africa are the teams who will be vying for a semi-final spot. Pakistan and Bangladesh are the next teams, but they will need to signficantly up their games if they are to have a shot at competing for one of those 4 slots.
Overall, this is going to be an amazing WC, likely the best one yet. It will be brutally unforgiving. A single game could make or break campaigns. I expect most of the games to be exciting, high scoring, and England has the best "neutral" crowds owing to the large expat populations of basically all the teams competing. The number of one-sided games should be limited to a bear minimum...I predict just 5-6 one-sided games out of 50 or so.
Not having the Associates will reduce the charm factor, but it will be replaced by big bucks, and high octane quality cricket.
ZCF OriginalZCF Hall of Famer
Opening post
Bangladesh cricket fanatic, observer of all others.
Member actions
Share