ZIMDOGGY wrote:not kidding when i say i always love hhms input
Stop feeding the trolls.
Discussion
Discussion
Opening post
ZIMDOGGY wrote:not kidding when i say i always love hhms input
Member actions
Share
eugene wrote:
ZIMDOGGY wrote:not kidding when i say i always love hhms input
Stop feeding the trolls.
Member actions
ShareMember actions
Share
Googly wrote:I'm not sure there is such a thing as white elitist schools, there appears to be a predominance of black elitist students enrolled in them from what I can see. Times have changed, and I would suggest that the white parents probably struggle to pay the fees more than their black counterparts in most instances.
I think there were 11 first league clubs registered at the end of last year, of which 5 had their own grounds, I stand to be corrected on the exact numbers, but it's thereabouts. On a couple of occasions teams with no grounds failed to pitch for games and points were shared.
One game at Takashinga resulted in a sharing of points because the covers were inadequate during a shower. The players at these clubs appear to swop around at will, especially to play stronger teams. Nothing that I am aware of stops high density players joining existing sports clubs and getting the cricket sections up and running again and resurrecting great facilities that are lying neglected. Having 6 strong teams is infinitely more preferable than 11 mediocre ones, plus of course there are the second teams. It would be much easier to organize and run efficiently and would result in a much higher standard of cricket. If some players were unable or unwilling to contribute towards membership fees then perhaps ZC and/or some of the Corporates could assist. Cricket costs money, there's no escaping it and why should more than half the teams not have to contribute anything? Pitching up at a well prepared ground when it suits and literally getting a free lunch is a poor show and only marginally preferable to a no-show. The current format is not of a first league standard and needs to be changed and run much more professionally.
That whole issue of Flower and Streak not going to West Indies is ridiculous. I'll guarantee that most of the team are not happy about it but are not prepared to say anything. I'm also willing to bet that at least one member of the ZC hierarchy pitches up for nothing more than a free holiday. I'll be following up on that and will be the first to apologize if I am wrong.
Your racial rhetoric serves to perpetuate an already sad situation. We have fallen light years behind the rest of the big cricketing nations, with absolutely no chance of ever bridging the gap (ever!!) because of people such as yourself. In fact you sound more like a policy maker than an amateur blogger. I sincerely believe that if all the whites stepped back you would get on your soap box and blame the next set of problems on the fact that they had opted out, it seems the whites are perpetual scape goats, particularly if they have a different opinion and dare to voice it. There are plenty of black guys that agree with my sentiments but dare not go on record because they will incorrectly be labelled as Uncle Toms. We are doomed to failure.
Member actions
Share
Googly wrote:I'm not sure there is such a thing as white elitist schools, there appears to be a predominance of black elitist students enrolled in them from what I can see. Times have changed, and I would suggest that the white parents probably struggle to pay the fees more than their black counterparts in most instances.
I think there were 11 first league clubs registered at the end of last year, of which 5 had their own grounds, I stand to be corrected on the exact numbers, but it's thereabouts. On a couple of occasions teams with no grounds failed to pitch for games and points were shared.
One game at Takashinga resulted in a sharing of points because the covers were inadequate during a shower. The players at these clubs appear to swop around at will, especially to play stronger teams. Nothing that I am aware of stops high density players joining existing sports clubs and getting the cricket sections up and running again and resurrecting great facilities that are lying neglected. Having 6 strong teams is infinitely more preferable than 11 mediocre ones, plus of course there are the second teams. It would be much easier to organize and run efficiently and would result in a much higher standard of cricket. If some players were unable or unwilling to contribute towards membership fees then perhaps ZC and/or some of the Corporates could assist. Cricket costs money, there's no escaping it and why should more than half the teams not have to contribute anything? Pitching up at a well prepared ground when it suits and literally getting a free lunch is a poor show and only marginally preferable to a no-show. The current format is not of a first league standard and needs to be changed and run much more professionally.
That whole issue of Flower and Streak not going to West Indies is ridiculous. I'll guarantee that most of the team are not happy about it but are not prepared to say anything. I'm also willing to bet that at least one member of the ZC hierarchy pitches up for nothing more than a free holiday. I'll be following up on that and will be the first to apologize if I am wrong.
Your racial rhetoric serves to perpetuate an already sad situation. We have fallen light years behind the rest of the big cricketing nations, with absolutely no chance of ever bridging the gap (ever!!) because of people such as yourself. In fact you sound more like a policy maker than an amateur blogger. I sincerely believe that if all the whites stepped back you would get on your soap box and blame the next set of problems on the fact that they had opted out, it seems the whites are perpetual scape goats, particularly if they have a different opinion and dare to voice it. There are plenty of black guys that agree with my sentiments but dare not go on record because they will incorrectly be labelled as Uncle Toms. We are doomed to failure.
Member actions
ShareMember actions
Share
Jemisi wrote:The Uncle Tom attack has been fired recently here.
Member actions
Share
Googly wrote:I'm not sure there is such a thing as white elitist schools, there appears to be a predominance of black elitist students enrolled in them from what I can see.
Nothing that I am aware of stops high density players joining existing sports clubs and getting the cricket sections up and running again and resurrecting great facilities that are lying neglected. If some players were unable or unwilling to contribute towards membership fees then perhaps ZC and/or some of the Corporates could assist. Cricket costs money, there's no escaping it and why should more than half the teams not have to contribute anything? The current format is not of a first league standard and needs to be changed and run much more professionally.
That whole issue of Flower and Streak not going to West Indies is ridiculous. I'll guarantee that most of the team are not happy about it but are not prepared to say anything. I'm also willing to bet that at least one member of the ZC hierarchy pitches up for nothing more than a free holiday. I'll be following up on that and will be the first to apologize if I am wrong.
Your racial rhetoric serves to perpetuate an already sad situation. We have fallen light years behind the rest of the big cricketing nations, with absolutely no chance of ever bridging the gap (ever!!) because of people such as yourself. In fact you sound more like a policy maker than an amateur blogger.
Member actions
Share
hhm wrote:... but sanctions have killed our industries...
hhm wrote:Once again, the minutes show Elton as one of those who said they prefer the technical team to be restricted to a Head and his assistant coach. I'd like to think a lot of other players agree with him. Minutes back that up, what backs up your view?
Member actions
Share
brmtaylor.com admin wrote:The sanctions that killed agriculture were self imposed...
That doesn't mean that the players knew that the specialist coaches and the fitness trainer would not be touring any more. "Streamlining" could mean virtually anything.
According to minutes of that meeting, Campbell asked the players if there was unity within the camp and Taylor said the team was not pulling in the same direction.
- Houghton also asked if the players felt the coaching staff had differences, which both Utseya and Taylor confirmed.
- Chigumbura felt the structure was too big adding that he preferred to work under a coach and assistant only.
- Houghton explained that there was no harmony in the team. It is understood there are factions within the team and players take instructions from their preferred coaches. There are players who choose to listen to Streak only, which is why the former captain has fallen victim.
- It is against this background that the committee recommended a technical structure with a head coach, assistant coach, analyst, physiotherapist, fitness trainer and a manager to be appointed on a tour by tour basis.
Member actions
ShareMember actions
Share