Kriterion_BD wrote:
gargamel wrote:Ive found our cricketers to be quite jacked up and quite intelligent. Ive found Panyangra to be very analytical , Chakabva to be a sound problem solver Aliseni is also highly educated , Propser has a very sound Cricketing mind. We need to be respectfull of our players and not think that they are not clever. Most have Olevels and Alevels and i know a few who are pursuing qualifications on a part time basis. Lets not b narrow minded and ignorant
The thing I've noticed about Zimbabwe cricket for the past few years is that they continuously lack the ability to make adjustments or to anticipate the adjustments the opposition might make. As a result, Zimbabwe have only won the odd match here and there which is probably due to the opposition being complacent or resting some key players. After the win, there is usually a resounding loss. I think there have only been a couple of win streaks, both against Bangladesh, and none longer than a 2 game streak. The common adage is that 90% of sports is from the neck up.
.
Oh please Kriterion you know ridiculous you sound? If that was the case 70 % of us here on the forums, if I can pound our own drum, would be playing for the national team.
Its natural ability, RESOURCES, practice - that goes without saying. Many excellent cricketers including some Australians can hardly string a coherent sentence together and still you insist on 90% of cricket being about brains? Come on. Your common adage is wrong.
I know you like being pompous and all knowing sometimes, of which I don't begrudge you; but in your eagerness to prop up our vocal Zimdoggy and Eugene, and paint Zimbo cricketers as a bunch of dullards, you have only managed to build a vain argument where substance is required.